|
|
|
|
Qwest, regulators take aim at 'cramming'
by
Martin Moylan,
January 25, 2010
But some businesses try to slip additional charges onto
consumers' phone bills without the consumers' knowledge. And now
Qwest is taking action against one firm.
Rachel Scott of
In Rachel Scott's case, the charge was $20. So she called both
Qwest and Enabill. It turned out that Enabill was passing on a
charge for some service that Scott could not imagine ever
ordering.
"They said, 'It's a service which allows you to have private
direct contact with celebrities,'" Scott recalled. "How on Earth
would something like that show up, because that's about the last
thing in the world that I would have possibly signed up for."
Scott figures she got crammed. "Cramming" occurs when a company
tries to add charges to a consumer's phone bill without the
consumer realizing it.
Cramming charges sometimes appear on a
phone bill with ambiguous terms such as "charges and credits" or
"enhanced services."
Regulators say cramming is a persistent problem, though they
don't receive a huge number of complaints about it. FTC
spokeswoman Lois Greisman says cramming is very much on the
agency's radar screen.
"The FTC has sued both vendors -- the sellers who try to place
unauthorized charges on consumers' telephone bills -- and also
the bill aggregators who serve as the third party between the
vendor and the carrier," said Greisman.
In the first quarter of 2009, the Federal Trade Commission
received about 3,000 complaints about cramming. That's not a
lot, given the hundreds of millions of phone lines Americans
have, wired and wireless. But it's easy for cramming to go
unnoticed.
Cramming charges sometimes appear on a phone bill with ambiguous
terms such as "charges and credits" or "enhanced services." That
can make people think they're legitimate.
Rachel Scott swears she can't remember doing anything to sign up
for the service that promised to hook her up with celebrities.
Qwest has listened to her complaints, and says it'll remove the
offending charges from Scott's bill.
"We have really strict laws here that require and enable
companies like Qwest to work on behalf of the customer," said
company spokeswoman Joanna Hjelmeland. "We will run it down for
you. And we will work as your advocate to get unauthorized
charges off your bill."
In Scott's case, Qwest also has decided it will no longer pass
on charges for the company that dinged Scott for the celebrity
entertainment service. The firm uses the names CMI and Headwind
Media, and it used Enabill to pass on the charges. Efforts to
reach the firms for comment were unsuccessful.
Qwest won't say how often CMI and Headwind Media have been the
subject of customer complaints. But Hjelmeland indicated there
have been too many, in Qwest's view.
"We have ended our relationship with CMI and Headwind Media. And
we will no longer be billing for them as of February 1," she
said.
Qwest and regulators such as the FTC and Public Utilities
Commission advise consumers to regularly check their bills for
charges they didn't authorize or, at least, knowingly approve.
"Contact your local phone company and tell them, 'Hey, this
isn't my charge. I didn't authorize it,'" advised Tracy Smetana,
a consumer mediator with the state Public Utilities Commission.
"What the local phone company should be doing at that point is
removing those charges, unless they have documentation from the
third party to say, 'Yes, customer A authorized this
transaction.'"
Consumers may unwittingly give a business permission to charge
them for unwanted services when they fill out sweepstakes entry
forms, or use a toll-free service like a date line or psychic
line.
Consumers also should be sure to read the front and back of any
prize registration form, especially if it asks for a phone
number.
|